Getting to solutions to the problems that currently face public education just simply won't be possible in a "short answer" format. Nevertheless, as a candidate who wants to serve on the state's highest policy-making body for public education, it will be incumbent upon me to offer a "short answer" that will at least shed some light on the solutions for which I advocate.
Charters - to be or not to be - is an issue for which many constituents want a short answer. I can almost guarantee a question in debate on the issue will be: Do you oppose (or support) charters? YES or NO
Much like the format of a standardized test where even bubbling in the "correct" answer reveals little about the quality of the test takers' learning, a YES or NO answer to the charter question reveals nothing about the respondent's insight regarding the charter conundrum. It certainly reveals nothing about the solutions that will be needed once a candidate is elected to BESE.
I read this conversation between Dr. Deborah Meier, well know early childhood educator and Joe Nathan, her long time colleague, friend and co-thinker from Minnesota, who is still a charter fan! Joe is the director of the Center for School Change.
Both offer their differing insights on charters and at the end, I offer mine which is concise but addresses only one small part of the numerous problems I have experienced with charters in Louisiana. YES I have problems with charters being funded as public schools.
I know these won't be my last words on charters as the campaign progresses. If you are a proponent or opponent of funding charters as public schools in Louisiana, please offer some specifics. I promise I will discuss them in a future blog.
Dr. Meier's concluding statement:
Alas, choice and privatization are being cheered on by the most powerful forces in the country and (yes) allies who get into the highly touted schools they create, while it's tearing apart advocates of public education and public space itself. That's what we need to figure out together--a program that brings advocates for the public space together.Joe Nathan's concluding statements:
I don't always agree with everyone supporting chartering. Neither do I agree with everyone who has supported other important expansions of opportunity over the last 40 years. Real-world progress comes from developing alliances among people who don't always agree. Chartering is not the only important strategy for improving schools. But it does respect the insights, ideas, and creativity of educators. Indeed, the idea of teacher- led schools is a growing, encouragement development. It's one of the good ideas that has come from chartering. I'll say more about other important strategies later this week.My response to the conversation:
I am guessing that charters would not have been so widely rejected had they proven themselves first as privately funded open enrollment schools. My guess is they would not be enjoying all the private funding had the agenda been innovative quality education for all students rather than facilitators for private investment profits. Time to acknowledge the realities, not just the aspirations.